Apache Ant Task Design Guidelines

This document covers how to write ant tasks to a standard required to be incorporated into the Ant distribution. You may find it useful when writing tasks for personal use as the issues it addresses are still there in such a case.

Don't break existing builds

Even if you find some really hideous problem with ant, one that is easy to fix, if your fix breaks an existing build file then we have problems. Making sure that every build file out there still works, is one of the goals of all changes. As an example of this, Ant1.5 passes the single dollar sign "$" through in strings; Ant1.4 and before would strip it. To get this fix in we first had to write the test suite to expose current behaviour, then change something so that singe $ was passed through, but double "$$" got mapped to "$" for backwards compatibility.

Use built in helper classes

Ant includes helper tasks to simplify much of your work. Be warned that these helper classes will look very different in ant2.0 from these 1.x versions. However it is still better to use them than roll your own, for development, maintenance and code size reasons.


Execute will spawn off separate programs under all the platforms which ant supports, dealing with Java version issues as well as platform issues. Always use this task to invoke other programs.

Java, ExecuteJava

These classes can be used to spawn Java programs in a separate VM (they use execute) or in the same VM -with or without a different classloader. When deriving tasks from this, it often benefits users to permit the classpath to be specified, and for forking to be an optional attribute.

Project and related classes

Project, FileUtils, JavaEnvUtils all have helper functions to do things like touch a file, to copy a file and the like. Use these instead of trying to code them yourself -or trying to use tasks which may be less stable and fiddlier to use.

Obey the Sun/Java style guidelines

The Ant codebase aims to have a single unified coding standard, and that standard is the Sun Java coding guidelines

It's not that they are better than any alternatives, but they are a standard and they are what is consistently used in the rest of the tasks. Code will not be incorporated into the database until it complies with these.

If you are writing a task for your personal or organisational use, you are free to use whatever style you like. But using the Sun Java style will help you to become comfortable with the rest of the Ant source, which may be important.

One important rule is 'no tabs'. Use four spaces instead. Not two, not eight, four. Even if your editor is configured to have a tab of four spaces, lots of others aren't -spaces have more consistency across editors and platforms. Some IDEs (JEdit) can highlight tabs, to stop you accidentally inserting them

There is an ant build file check.xml in the main ant directory with runs checkstyle over ant's source code.

Attributes and elements

Use the Ant introspection based mapping of attributes into Java datatypes, rather than implementing all your attributes as setFoo(String) and doing the mapping to Int, bool or file yourself. This saves work on your part, lets Java callers use you in a typesafe manner, and will let the Xdocs documentation generator work out what the parameters are.

The ant1.x tasks are very inconsistent regarding naming of attributes -some tasks use source, others src. Here is a list of preferred attribute names.
failonerror boolean to control whether failure to execute should throw a BuildException or just print an error. Parameter validation failures should always throw an error, regardless of this flag
destdir destination directory for output
destfile destination file for output
srcdir source directory
srcfile source file
Yes, this is a very short list. Try and be vaguely consistent with the core tasks, at the very least.

Support classpaths

Try and make it possible for people to supply a classpath to your task, if you need external libraries, rather than make them add everything to the ANT_HOME\lib directory. This lets people keep the external libraries in their ant-based project, rather than force all users to make changes to their ant system configuration.

Design for controlled re-use

Keep member variables private. If read access by subclasses is required. add accessor methods rather than change the accessiblity of the member. This enables subclasses to access the contents, yet still be decoupled from the actual implementation.

The other common re-use mechanism in ant is for one task to create and configure another. This is fairly simple.

Do your own Dependency Checking

Make has the edge over Ant in its integrated dependency checking: the command line apps make invokes dont need to do their own work. Ant tasks do have to do their own dependency work, but if this can be done then it can be done well. A good dependency aware task can work out the dependencies without explicit dependency information in the build file, and be smart enough to work out the real dependencies, perhaps through a bit of file parsing. The depends task is the best example of this. Some of the zip/jar tasks are pretty good too, as they can update the archive when needed. Most tasks just compare source and destination timestamps and work from there. Tasks which don't do any dependency checking do not help users as much as they can, because their needless work can trickle through the entire build, test and deploy process.

Support Java 1.2 through Java 1.4

Ant1.5 and lower was designed to support Java1.1. Ant1.6 and higher is designed to support Java1.2: to build on it, to run on it. Sometimes functionality of tasks have to degrade in that environment - this is usually due to library limitations; such behaviour change must always be noted in the documentation.

What is problematic is code which is dependent on Java1.3 features -java.lang.reflect.Proxy, or Java1.4 features - java.io.nio for example. Be also aware of extra methods in older classes - like StringBuffer#append(StringBuffer). These can not be used directly by any code and still be able to compile and run on a Java 1.2 system. If a new method in an existing class is to be used, it must be used via reflection and the NoSuchMethodException handled somehow.

What if code simply does not work on Java1.2? It can happen. It will probably be OK to have the task as an optional task, with compilation restricted to Java1.3 or later through build.xml modifications. Better still, use reflection to link to the classes at run time.

Java 1.4 adds a new optional change to the language itself, the assert keyword, which is only enabled if the compiler is told to compile 1.4 version source. Clearly with the 1.2 compatibility requirement, Ant tasks can not use this keyword. They also need to move away from using the JUnit assert() method and call assertTrue() instead.

Java 1.5 will (perhaps) add a new keyword - enum, one should avoid this for future compatibility.


If the changes made to a task are making it too unwieldy, split it up into a cleaner design, refactor the code and submit not just feature creep but cleaner tasks. A common design pattern which tends to occur in the ant process is the adoption of the adapter pattern, in which a base class (say Javac or Rmi) starts off simple, then gets convoluted with support for multiple back ends -javac, jikes, jvc. A refactoring to split the programmable front end from the classes which provide the back end cleans up the design and makes it much easier to add new back ends. But to carry this off one needs to keep the interface and behaviour of the front end identical, and to be sure that no subclasses have been accessing data members directly -because these data members may not exist in the refactored design. Which is why having private data members is so important.


Look in ant/src/testcases and you will find JUnit tests for the shipping ant tasks, to see how it is done and what is expected of a new task. Most of them are rudimentary, and no doubt you could do better for your task -feel free to do so!

A well written set of test cases will break the Ant task while it is in development, until the code is actually complete. And every bug which surfaces later should have a test case added to demonstrate the problem, and to fix it.

The test cases are a great way of testing your task during development. A simple call to 'build run-test' in the ant source tree will run all ant tests, to verify that your changes don't break anything. To test a single task, use the one shot ant run-single-test -Dtestcase=${testname} where ${testname} is the name of your test class.

The test cases are also used by the committers to verify that changes and patches do what they say. If you've got test cases it increases your credibility significantly. To be precise, we hate submissions without test cases, as it means we have to write them ourselves. This is something that only gets done if we need the task or it is perceived as utterly essential to many users.

Remember also that Ant 1.x is designed to compile and run on Java1.2, so you should test on Java 1.2 as well as any later version which you use. You can download an old SDK from Sun for this purpose.

Finally, run a full build test before and after you start developing your project, to make sure you havent broken anything else by accident.


Without documentation, the task can't be used. So remember to provide a succint and clear html (soon, xml) page describing the task in a similar style to that of existing tasks. It should include a list of attributes and elements, and at least one working example of the task. Many users cut and paste the examples into their build files as a starting point, so make the examples practical and test them too.

You can use the xdocs stuff in proposal/xdocs to autogenerate your documentation page from the javadocs of the source; this makes life easier and will make the transition to a full xdoclet generated documentation build process trivial.

Licensing and Copyright

Any code submitted to the Apache project must be compatible with the Apache Software License, and the act of submission must be viewed as an implicit transfer of ownership of the submitted code to the Apache Software Foundation.

This is important.

The fairly laissez-faire license of Apache is not compabitible with either the GPL or the Lesser GPL of the Free Software Foundation -the Gnu project. These licenses have stricter terms, "copyleft", which are not in the Apache Software Foundation license. This permits people and organisations to build commercial and closed source applications atop the Apache libraries and source -but not use the Apache, Ant or Jakarta Project names without permission.

Because the Gnu GPL license immediately extends to cover any larger application (or library, in the case of GLPL) into which it is incorporated, the Ant team can not incorporate any task based upon GPL or LGPL source into the Ant codebase. You are free to submit it, but it will be politely and firmly rejected.

Once ant-2 adds better dynamic task incorporation, it may be possible to provide a framework for indirectly supporting [L]GPL code, but still no tasks directly subject to the Gnu licenses can be included in the Ant CVS tree.

If you link to a GPL or LGPL library, by import or reflection, your task must be licensed under the same terms. So tasks linking to (L)GPL code can't go into the Apache managed codebase. Tasks calling such code can use the 'exec' or 'java' tasks to run the programs, as you are just executing them at this point, not linking to them.

Even if we cannot include your task into the Apache codebase, we can still point to where you host it -just submit a diff to xdocs/external.html pointing to your task. If your task links directly to proprietary code, we have a differnt problem: it is really hard to build the tasks. Please use reflection.

Dont re-invent the wheel

We've all done it: written and submitted a task only to discover it was already implemented in a small corner of another task, or it has been submitted by someone else and not committed. You can avoid this by being aware of what is in the latest CVS tree -keep getting the daily source updates, look at manual changes and subscribe to the dev mailing list.

If you are thinking of writing a task, posting a note on your thoughts to the list can be informative -you well get other peoples insight and maybe some half written task to do the basics, all without writing a line of code.

Submitting to Ant

The process for submitting an Ant task is documented on the jakarta web site. The basic mechanism is to mail it to the dev mailing list. It helps to be on this list, as you will see other submissions, and any debate about your own submission.

You may create your patch file using either of the following approaches. The committers recommend you to take the first approach.

The patches should be sent as an attachment to a message titled [PATCH] and distinctive one-line summary in the subject of the patch. The filename/task and the change usually suffices. It's important to include the changes as an attachment, as too many mailers reformat the text pasted in, which breaks the patch.

Then you wait for one of the committers to commit the patch, if it is felt appropriate to do so. Bug fixes go in quickly, other changes often spark a bit of discussion before a (perhaps revised) commit is made.

New submissions should be proceeded with [SUBMIT]. The mailer-daemon will reject any messages over 100KB, so any large update should be zipped up. If your submission is bigger than that, why not break it up into separate tasks.

We also like submissions to be added to bugzilla, so that they dont get lost. Please submit them by first filing the report with a meaningful name, then adding files as attachments. Use CVS diff files please!

If you hear nothing after a couple of weeks, remind the mailing list. Sometimes really good submissions get lost in the noise of other issues. This is particularly the case just prior to a new point release of the product. At that time anything other than bug fixes will tend to be neglected.


These are the things you should verify before submitting patches and new tasks. Things don't have to be perfect, it may take a couple of iterations before a patch or submission is committed, and these items can be addressed in the process. But by the time the code is committed, everything including the documentation and some test cases will have been done, so by getting them out the way up front can save time. The committers look more favourably on patches and submissions with test cases, while documentation helps sell the reason for a task.

Checklist before submitting a patch

Checklist before submitting a new task

Copyright © 2001-2003 Apache Software Foundation. All rights Reserved.